Nursing Questions
NursingQuestions
NursingQuestions
Fu,M., Hu, J., & Cai, X. (2015). Effectiveness of a community-baseddiabetes self-management intervention for Chinese adults with type 2diabetes: A pilot study. InternationalJournal of Nursing Practice,21132-140 9p. doi:10.1111/ijn.12373
Questionone:What is the purpose of this research?
Thisstudy aims at evaluating impacts of an intervention concerning theawareness of diabetes and how Chinese older people can managementthemselves regarding type-2 diabetes.
Questiontwo:What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit orexplicit.
Howcan individuals with type 2 diabetes in Wuhan, China be helped toimprove their health conditions through self-management?
Doestype-2 diabetes knowledge have any impact on the welfare of adultsChina?
Questionthree:Give a complete description of the research design of this study.
Aquestionnaire was used to harvest data for this research. Questionsthat yield data regarding diabetes self-management, blood pressure,waist circumference, diabetes knowledge, body mass index and fastingblood glucose level were presented before and after the intervention.Further, the researchers conducted one-month follow-up.
Questionfour:Describe the population (sample) for this study.
29participants, all adults with type-2 diabetes were involved in theinvestigation. They participated as a sample in a six-weekintervention, which was held in a community health care facility.
Questionfive:Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected andexplain why?
Apparently,the used population was sufficient due to some reasons. Firstly, thepopulation was neither small nor huge. In such case, the chance ofyielding more errors due to inconveniences is less. Secondly, it iseasy to measure the data presented compared to when using a hugesample (Aghaeepour et al. 2013).
Questionsix:Describe the data collection procedure.
Thequestionnaire was used to collect data. Each participant waspresented with purposeful questions. The questions targeted issuesrelating to fasting blood glucose level, diabetes self-management,blood pressure, waist circumference, diabetes knowledge, and bodymass index.
Questionseven:How were the data analyzed after collection?
Aqualitative data analysis was employed after data collection. Asample which allows perceiving entire research process wasincorporated in the study. Through purposive sampling, the mostproductive population was selected, hence ensuring they have theskills to answer all the presented questions (Aghaeepour et al.2013).
Questioneight:Discuss the limitations found in the study.
However,the fact that the research relies on a questionnaire there is achance of biases, especially from the self-reported data. At somepoint, the participants may present force information that may affectthe entire research.
Questionnine:Discuss the authors` conclusions. Do you feel these findings arebased on the data that they collected?
Firstly,a few people had knowledge about diabetes. The level of education washigh in the post-intervention compared to pre- intervention. However,medication adherence, as well as self-monitoring of blood glucose,did not have any improvement. According to the data, it is evidentthat most of the type 2 diabetes patients are more focused onself-management, but they lack competent knowledge about theirillness.
Questionten:How does this advance knowledge in the field?
Creatingenlightenment programs as well as encouraging type 2 diabetespatients to enroll in them is the best approach towards improvingtheir conditions. Therefore, healthcare practitioners should befocused on the welfare of adults with type 2 diabetes regardingknowledge.
Pals,R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M.E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a newtechnology in clinical practice: a qualitative study of patient andphysician perspectives. BMCHealth Services Research, 15(1),1-10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1
Questionone:What is the purpose of this research?
Thisstudy targets to evaluate how users perceive as well as interpret newtechnologies in a healthcare setting.
Questiontwo:What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit orexplicit.
Howdo ill people as well as their physician apprehend the effectivenessof modern technology? Do both parties take slightly the employment ofCardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN) in a specialist diabetesfacility?
Questionthree:Give a complete description of the research design of this study.
Thisresearch employed a design with multiple approaches includingobservation and interviews with both patients and physicians. Theparticipants were interviewed from one of the specialist diabetesfacilities.
Questionfour:Describe the population (sample) for this study.
Meanwhile,eight participants were involved in observation, especially themedical consultations. Next, 9 patients, who were engaged in the CANtest, were interviewed as well as 9 physicians on the same case.
Questionfive:Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected andexplain why?
Thesample for the investigation was appropriate because of its relianceon different points of view. For instance, using both patients andphysicians gave the researcher a chance to examine data from allsides, which was also a right approach towards exhausting all thepossible questions (Aghaeepour et al. 2013).
Questionsix:Describe the data collection procedure.
Datacollection comprised of both observation and interviews. Firstly,Medical consultations were observed, and results were reported.Secondly, patients and physicians were subjected to various questionsregarding new technologies with the aim of learning how theyapprehend them.
Questionseven:How were the data analyzed?
Meanwhile,the hypothesis of technological frames data was employed in the dataanalysis. Through the method, researchers were able to assess towhich extent do the parties involved perceive as well as apprehendmodern technology.
Questioneight:Discuss the limitations found in the study?
Thelimitation deduced from the research involves the use of observation.Through the study design, research could yield biased data,especially if he/she does not understand the best ways to engage it.
Questionnine:Discuss the authors` conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions arebased on the data that they collected?
Apparently,introducing a new risk assessment technology like CAN test mayinvolve multiple challenges. In such case, vivid directions, as wellas competent information, should be presented to ensure that bothparties perceive it.
Questionten:How does this advance knowledge in the field?
Themodern technology is advancing at a rapid speed hence knowledgesharing measures should be implemented in all spheres, especially inthe nursing profession. In such case, creating awareness about CANtest is the best approach towards yielding competent results.
Reference
Aghaeepour,N., Finak, G., Hoos, H., Mosmann, T. R., Brinkman, R., Gottardo, R.,… & DREAM Consortium. (2013). Critical assessment of automatedflow cytometry data analysis techniques. Naturemethods, 10(3),228-238.
No related posts.