The effect of photography and camera on painting
Theeffect of photography and camera on painting
Photographyhas taken root in the recent past in many parts of the society,thereby, indicating that there is a huge shift in the way people viewand use art. People have increased their need to consume photographyproducts, as they continue to infiltrate the world in large numbers,as opposed to the case of painting (Hershberger 42). Many peopletoday view the onset of photography as a massive replacement of thepainting era, given the fact that it has increased the chances ofcapturing the real-time appearance of various elements. It also thechances of the images shown being more real than they most oftenappear when painted. The paper aims to look into how photography andcamera have generally affected painting.
Despitethe fact that painting remains to be quite relevant in thecontemporary times, it is, however, true that photography has, by alarge margin reduced the need for painters. Photographs provide ahigh level of convenience for people and are way cheaper compared topaintings (Fielding 35). They also help people relate more to theelements contained in the paintings, given the high level of accuracythat are normally associated with the images. Photography has alsomade it quite easier to have a replicability of the same image.Therefore, people prefer using the same, especially in the situationwhere many of them need to have the same image representing the givenelement or memory they share. In such a case, photography makes itquite easy for people to have access to the different images that maybe of interest to various people.
Photographyand camera have also been quite important at influencing paintingpositively. It helps to ensure painters are able to keep images ofsceneries they aim to portray in their pieces of work. Such a case,therefore, means that such individuals could end up having a highcapability to bring out the different elements contained in the givenscenery in a manner that would be most appropriate (Wells 73). It,therefore, increases the chances of painters representing variousevents and situations in a manner that would be more realistic toother individuals. Painters are also able to take photographs of thepaintings they have done and post them on various online platforms inorder to advertise their pieces of work and increase their chances ofmaking better sales. Such a case, therefore, ensures that paintersare able to take advantage of the good opportunities that are broughtabout with photography. Such a case, therefore, ensures painters areable to attain better outcomes that would increase their chances ofcontinuing to make a living from art.
Inconclusion, it is evident that photography has had a great effect onpainting. There are disadvantages that associated to the same, owingto the many strong features that are related with photography. Such acase, therefore, ensures that painters make lesser sales than theywould have, had there been no photography. It is, however, crucial tonote that photography in its sense, also provides betteropportunities given the fact that it enables painters to capture thescenes they wish to portray. Through the process, they are able toclearly make the painting in a more accurate way. Photography hasalso made it possible for artists to easily market their works.
Fielding,Raymond. “Techniques of Special Effects of Cinematography.” CRCPress, 2013, 35
Hershberger,Andrew E. "Photographic theory: a historical anthology."(2014). 44-49
Wells,Liz, Ed. “Photography: a critical introduction.” Routledge, 2015.71-76
No related posts.